The Neocolonial Confusion: China’s Ever-Confusing Role as a Neocolonial Power in the Dawn of Shifting Global Cooperation

Forbidden City, Beijing, China

As the sun begins to set on centuries of Western dominance, the global balance of power is shifting—not with the bang of cannons or the draw of borders, but with the hum of construction equipment, the signatures on infrastructure loans, and the silent spread of surveillance systems. At the heart of this new order stands the People’s Republic of China: a country that calls itself a friend to the Global South, yet whose actions increasingly mirror the extractive and coercive tactics of yesterday’s colonial powers.

The irony is rich, and the confusion is intentional. Beijing’s global strategy, most visible through its Belt and Road Initiative (BRI), is framed as “win-win cooperation”—a euphemism for the transactional diplomacy that now stretches from Sri Lanka’s ports to Zambian copper mines to Ecuador’s hydroelectric dams. What China offers is infrastructure, capital, and speed. What it often demands in return is loyalty, silence, and resources.

Yet to label China’s rise simply as “neocolonial” is to oversimplify a far more complex—and dangerous—phenomenon. Unlike the 19th-century empires of Europe, China doesn’t conquer with flags or standing armies. It colonizes ambiguity. It operates in a grey zone, blending commerce, diplomacy, and surveillance into a web of influence that’s difficult to untangle and harder still to resist. Its digital infrastructure comes bundled with data pipelines. Its loans come with clauses that bind governments long after leaders leave office. And its relationships, while packaged as South-South solidarity, are often steeped in asymmetry.

A New Empire Without the Name

The classical colonial model was visible: it imposed itself on bodies, borders, and beliefs. But Beijing’s model is subtler. In Africa, Chinese companies build roads while extracting rare earth minerals. In Latin America, they fund energy projects while locking governments into long-term debt obligations. In Southeast Asia, Chinese developers erect entire cities—on foreign soil. Often these projects lack transparency, employ Chinese labor instead of local workers, and leave host countries with mounting liabilities and minimal long-term gain.

Unlike the United States or former European powers, China cloaks its foreign policy in the language of non-interference. This has won it favor with leaders in countries weary of Western lecturing on democracy or human rights. But this hands-off rhetoric belies a growing assertiveness: from controlling vital communications infrastructure to pressuring governments at the UN to support Beijing’s positions on Taiwan or Xinjiang, China’s influence is increasingly difficult to ignore.

Debt, Data, and Dependency

The most glaring signs of China’s neocolonial footprint come in the form of debt traps. Sri Lanka’s Hambantota Port was handed over to China on a 99-year lease after the country defaulted on its loan. Kenya’s Standard Gauge Railway—once hailed as a symbol of progress—now weighs down the country’s economy. In many cases, these deals are made behind closed doors, with little public oversight, creating conditions ripe for corruption, dependency, and elite capture.

And then there’s data: the new oil of the 21st century. Chinese-built “safe city” programs, surveillance systems, and internet infrastructure offer convenience and modernization—but at what cost? Reports suggest these technologies may allow Chinese firms (and by extension, the Chinese state) to collect and analyze sensitive data in foreign countries. In the absence of enforceable global standards on digital privacy and cybersecurity, this represents not just a commercial advantage—but a form of informational colonization.

The Global South's Dilemma

To be clear, many countries actively choose to engage with China because they see few alternatives. After decades of being neglected, lectured, or exploited by the West, leaders across the Global South see Beijing as a counterweight to traditional power structures. China offers fast financing, infrastructure without political strings, and a seat at forums like BRICS and the Shanghai Cooperation Organization. For many, it represents an opportunity to play the great powers off one another and carve out new leverage.

But this embrace comes with risks. In some cases, Chinese investment has sparked protests, environmental damage, and social unrest. Communities displaced by mega-projects, local industries undermined by Chinese competition, and workers subjected to poor conditions are increasingly vocal. The lack of accountability, labor protections, and ecological standards in many Chinese-backed initiatives is beginning to erode the goodwill China once enjoyed.

A Crisis of Multilateralism

What makes China’s role so uniquely confusing is the broader collapse of global consensus. With traditional multilateral institutions like the UN, WTO, and World Bank weakened by gridlock, nationalism, and distrust, China is both exploiting and reshaping the rules. It builds parallel institutions—like the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank (AIIB)—and advances its influence through bilateral deals that bypass the traditional checks and balances of global governance.

Meanwhile, the West flounders in response. Caught between outdated Cold War mentalities and protectionist reflexes, it has failed to offer a compelling alternative to China's model. The result is a world increasingly split—not into ideological camps—but into networks of dependency, transaction, and quiet coercion.

Conclusion: A Post-Colonial Future or a Neo-Empire in Disguise?

China is not the British Empire. It does not send missionaries or enforce English lessons. But it is building a new kind of empire—fueled by cement, surveillance, and contracts. It thrives not through violence, but through ambiguity. And that may be the most dangerous form of colonialism yet.

As the world enters a new era of global cooperation—or fragmentation—understanding China's role is no longer optional. It is essential. We must name the system. We must confront the confusion. And we must build a world where development does not come at the cost of sovereignty, transparency, and justice.

Because if we fail to do so, we won’t be witnessing the rise of a new world order.

We’ll be watching history repeat itself—with smarter tools and fewer scruples.

Bibliography

1. Heeks, Richard, Christopher Foster, Ping Gao, Xia Han, Nicholas Jepson, Seth Schindler, and Qingna Zhou. "China’s Digital Expansion in the Global South: Special Issue Introduction." The Information Society 40, no. 2 (March 14, 2024). https://doi.org/10.1080/01972243.2024.2315868.​Taylor & Francis Online+5Research Explorer+5CoLab+5

2. Warner, Jason, and Toyosi Ajibade. "China’s Smart Cities in Africa: Should the United States Be Concerned?" Center for Strategic and International Studies, November 18, 2024. https://www.csis.org/analysis/chinas-smart-cities-africa-should-united-states-be-concerned.​LinkedIn+4CSIS+4CSIS+4

3. Passalaqua, Claudio C., and Carolina Polito. "The Chinese Supply of Surveillance Technology to Africa." Luiss School of Government, May 2024. https://sog.luiss.it/sites/sog.luiss.it/files/The%20Chinese%20Supply%20of%20Surveillance%20Technology%20to%20Africa.pdf.​School of Government Luiss Guido Carli

4. Jili, Bulelani. "What Is Driving the Adoption of Chinese Surveillance Technology in Africa?" Atlantic Council, March 2023. https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/in-depth-research-reports/issue-brief/what-is-driving-the-adoption-of-chinese-surveillance-technology-in-africa/.​Atlantic Council+1Atlantic Council+1

5. "China, the Belt and Road Initiative, and the Hambantota Port Project." JSTOR. Accessed May 2, 2025. https://www.jstor.org/stable/27027759.​JSTOR

6. "China's Belt and Road Initiative." JSTOR. Accessed May 2, 2025. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26663717.​JSTOR

7. "China's Belt and Road Initiative Financing in Southeast Asia." JSTOR. Accessed May 2, 2025. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26938885.​JSTOR

8. "China's Digital Expansion in the Global South: Systematic Literature Review and Future Research Agenda." The Information Society 40, no. 2 (March 14, 2024). https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/01972243.2024.2315875.​Hummedia+5ICTs for Development+5Research Explorer+5

9. "China's Digital Expansion in the Global South: Special Issue Introduction." The Information Society 40, no. 2 (March 14, 2024). https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/01972243.2024.2315868.​Taylor & Francis Online+4Research Explorer+4CoLab+4

10. "China's Digital Expansion in the Global South: Special Issue Introduction." The Information Society 40, no. 2 (March 14, 2024). https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/01972243.2024.2315868.​